Microsoft: We’re Eliminating Backup Generators
September 17th, 2012 By: Rich Miller
For many years, the diesel backup generator has been a symbol of reliability for data centers, providing the emergency power to keep servers online during utility power outages. But the growing focus on using clean energy to power large data centers is prompting some of the industry’s largest players to ditch their generators, along with their diesel fuel emissions.
Microsoft is the latest company to announce its intention to reduce its use of diesel generators. The move is part of a broader initiative to make Microsoft’s server farms more sustainable and less reliant on the utility grid.
“We are currently exploring alternative backup energy options that would allow us to provide emergency power without the need for diesel generators, which in some cases will mean transitioning to cleaner-burning natural gas and in other cases, eliminating the need for back-up generation altogether,” Microsoft Utility Architect Brian Janous wrote in a blog post last week.
The reference to natural gas suggests that Microsoft is preparing to implement fuel cells to replace its generators. That could be good news for Bloom Energy, whose fuel cells will replace generators and UPS units at a new eBay data center in Utah. “Bloom boxes” are also being deployed to provide supplementary power at Apple’s iDataCenter in North Carolina.
Committing to Renewable Power
Generators have been associated with several headaches for Microsoft’s data center unit in recent years, including an Azure cloud outage in Europe (when multiple generators didn’t start during a utility outage) and a public controversy about whether the diesel emissions from Microsoft’s generators in Quincy, Washington could cause health problems for local residents (the state EPA says no).
But Microsoft’s motivation to find alternatives to diesel generators is rooted in its commitment to become less dependent on the utility grid, and use renewable energy to power its servers wherever possible. The company says its vision for “data plants” will break new ground in integrating electricity and computing, bring together data centers and renewable power generation.
Microsoft has been exploring the potential for a waste-powered data center that will be built on the site of a water treatment plant or landfill. In his blog post, Janous indicated that Microsoft is evaluating this design at a biomass project in Europe. The company is also looking at a “photovoltaic solar project in the Southwestern U.S.” Microsoft wouldn’t provide additional details, but it’s worth noting that the company has previously discussed installing a photovoltaic solar array at its data center in San Antonio.
Designing Around Generators
The most intriguing tidbit in this week’s disclosures was Microsoft’s plans to reduce its need for generators. Diesel engine exhaust is a regulated pollutant, and can be toxic in high concentrations.
“Given the unreliability of the electric grid and the need for continuous availability of cloud services, Microsoft maintains diesel generator backup at all of our data centers, as is typical across the industry,” Janous wrote. “Our policy is to use these backup generators only when necessary to help maintain grid stability or in extraordinary repair, and maintenance situations that require us to take our data centers off the power grid. These generators are inefficient and costly to operate. From both an environmental and a cost standpoint, it makes no sense to run our generators more than we absolutely must.”
So how do you eliminate generators? In a traditional configuration, data centers use the utility grid for primary power, with UPS units and backup generators providing emergency power in the event of grid outages. Bloom has advanced a power infrastructure design in which Bloom Energy Servers powered by natural gas serve as the primary power source, with the utility grid used as a backup service.
Such a configuration could alter the historic economics of using fuel cells in data centers. One of the primary barriers to adoption has been the cost of the fuel cells. But if using fuel cells allows data centers to eliminate expenses for UPS units and generators, the cost equation looks very different.
Microsoft is also considering “long term purchases from larger grid-connected installations that would displace some portion of our grid purchases,” Janous wrote. Google has embraced a similar strategy, using power purchasing agreements to add more than 200 megawatts of wind power to the local utility grids that support its data centers. These bulk purchases can help guarantee long-term revenue for new renewable power projects, stimulating additional generation of renewable energy.
Towards that end, Microsoft is taking steps to position itself to make bulk power deals. “We have recently signed on as an advisory board member with Altenex, an operator of a network that enables member companies to more efficiently engage with developers of renewable energy projects,” Janous said. “We expect this engagement with Altenex to improve our ability to identify and evaluate cost-effective clean energy projects.”
“Given the unreliability of the electrical grid…” Really. Average uptime is 99.99% in the US. An associate has a data center in India where the generators ran 435 times in 2011 due to power outages/fluctuations. I feel this would better fit the statement above.
I applaud their efforts and would like more articles of this nature including the progress of eBay and Apple data centers.
[...] to use fuel cells from Bloom Energy for its data centers? In a blog post last week (hat tip Data Center Knowledge) Microsoft’s Utility Architect Brian Janous writes that Microsoft is looking for new backup [...]
[...] to use fuel cells from Bloom Energy for its data centers? In a blog post last week (hat tip Data Center Knowledge) Microsoft’s Utility Architect Brian Janous writes that Microsoft is looking for new backup power [...]
[...] it's true. Microsoft is eliminating backup generators and switching to alternative methods of providing backup power (in some cases – in others, they're [...]
H.N.Posted September 17th, 2012
At Microsoft’s scale, Gas Turbine generators sounds much better fit than fuel cells, simply because it takes 25 Bloom units to power 4,500kVA, whereas a single gas turbine generator can generate the same amount of power. In fact, some US datacenters are already using gas turbine generators as their primary power source…
Site selection in Sweden is one solution to grid reliability issues. There have been no outages at the Facebook site since the 1970s. Why is the grid so reliable? The answer is here…
Cliff TaylorPosted October 5th, 2012
I’m with Roy Franklin (above comment). Just how unreliable is Microsofts electric grid that they are on?
Ours here ni Upsate NY is very reliable and stable. We very rarely even have a brown out. Is Microsoft just looking to jump on the Bloom bandwagon and get their name in the “green pages”. Hey good for them if they do it. But I would like to know how many times a year they did use their gensets.
eman sawatPosted January 24th, 2014
i want to know a comparison between number of diesel and gas turbine generator used in nuclear power plant in all the world