<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storms KO NaviSite San Jose Data Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Backfires, Misfires, and Duds… &#171; Enterprise Strategy Group</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-10609</link>
		<dc:creator>Backfires, Misfires, and Duds… &#171; Enterprise Strategy Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=21000#comment-10609</guid>
		<description>[...] Misfire &#8211; Storms KO NaviSite San Jose Data Center: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Misfire &#8211; Storms KO NaviSite San Jose Data Center: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backfires, Misfires, and Duds… &#171; IT Artillery</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-10606</link>
		<dc:creator>Backfires, Misfires, and Duds… &#171; IT Artillery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=21000#comment-10606</guid>
		<description>[...] Misfire &#8211; Storms KO NaviSite San Jose Data Center: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Misfire &#8211; Storms KO NaviSite San Jose Data Center: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-10309</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=21000#comment-10309</guid>
		<description>Losing backup generators is pretty bad for a company in the &quot;high-availability&quot; hosting business -- and it has a huge trickle down impact for clients like Prostores:
  &quot;The generators are now up &amp; we are working to get all servers online. We anticipate having service fully restored w/in two to three hours.&quot; (http://twitter.com/prostores)

Navisite has had this facility for several years, so they might be over-subscribing their power capacity.  If not, I doubt they would have had this outage if they had been doing full load generator testing once a week -- which is the standard for Tier-4 data-centers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Losing backup generators is pretty bad for a company in the &#8220;high-availability&#8221; hosting business &#8212; and it has a huge trickle down impact for clients like Prostores:<br />
  &#8220;The generators are now up &amp; we are working to get all servers online. We anticipate having service fully restored w/in two to three hours.&#8221; (<a href="http://twitter.com/prostores" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/prostores</a>)</p>
<p>Navisite has had this facility for several years, so they might be over-subscribing their power capacity.  If not, I doubt they would have had this outage if they had been doing full load generator testing once a week &#8212; which is the standard for Tier-4 data-centers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfredo</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-10117</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=21000#comment-10117</guid>
		<description>As a business, it&#039;s important to have redudant data center site(s) that can fail over with little to no impact and to insure there are heavy financial penalities in the contract when a colo doesn&#039;t meet it&#039;s obligations.  From  a distance (speculation) there are a number of reasons why this load didn&#039;t fail over to generator.  Perhaps they didn&#039;t perform a full comission of the building before going online, or perhaps they reduced their preventative maintenance cost.  To Nates point, I don&#039;t think anyone should fear the flywheel.  I believe a quarterly maintenance that requires a full load transfer under a controlled environment (electricians, mechanical engineers, generator tech, facility staff,  on site etc) and following a MOP (Method of Procedure) would have caught the problem and been repaired so when a real utlity power loss happens, you don&#039;t drop power to your customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a business, it&#8217;s important to have redudant data center site(s) that can fail over with little to no impact and to insure there are heavy financial penalities in the contract when a colo doesn&#8217;t meet it&#8217;s obligations.  From  a distance (speculation) there are a number of reasons why this load didn&#8217;t fail over to generator.  Perhaps they didn&#8217;t perform a full comission of the building before going online, or perhaps they reduced their preventative maintenance cost.  To Nates point, I don&#8217;t think anyone should fear the flywheel.  I believe a quarterly maintenance that requires a full load transfer under a controlled environment (electricians, mechanical engineers, generator tech, facility staff,  on site etc) and following a MOP (Method of Procedure) would have caught the problem and been repaired so when a real utlity power loss happens, you don&#8217;t drop power to your customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-10085</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=21000#comment-10085</guid>
		<description>issues like this that sends shivers down my spines when people talk about using flywheel UPS systems and having a matter of seconds for backup generators to respond. Assuming on site personnel I&#039;d want at least 15-20 minutes of backup power in the event a generator fails to start, gives some time to troubleshoot at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>issues like this that sends shivers down my spines when people talk about using flywheel UPS systems and having a matter of seconds for backup generators to respond. Assuming on site personnel I&#8217;d want at least 15-20 minutes of backup power in the event a generator fails to start, gives some time to troubleshoot at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday data center tidbits. &#171; The Server Room</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/01/19/storms-ko-navisite-san-jose-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-10084</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday data center tidbits. &#171; The Server Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=21000#comment-10084</guid>
		<description>[...] } In the news today is the crash of the NaviSite data center in San Jose as the result of backup power failure. This is the best example I&#8217;ve seen why the move to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] } In the news today is the crash of the NaviSite data center in San Jose as the result of backup power failure. This is the best example I&#8217;ve seen why the move to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

