<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Sky: Supercomputing and Efficiency Meet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/11/17/red-sky-supercomputing-efficiency-meet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/11/17/red-sky-supercomputing-efficiency-meet/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Perspectives - Is Sandia National Lab's Red Sky Really Able to Deliver a PUE of 1.035?</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/11/17/red-sky-supercomputing-efficiency-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-8294</link>
		<dc:creator>Perspectives - Is Sandia National Lab's Red Sky Really Able to Deliver a PUE of 1.035?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=18336#comment-8294</guid>
		<description>[...] PUE of 1.035, Rich Miller of Data Center Knowledge astutely asked “How’s this possible?” (see Red Sky: Supercomputing and Efficiency Meet). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PUE of 1.035, Rich Miller of Data Center Knowledge astutely asked “How’s this possible?” (see Red Sky: Supercomputing and Efficiency Meet). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/11/17/red-sky-supercomputing-efficiency-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-8180</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=18336#comment-8180</guid>
		<description>The claimed PUE of 1.035 for RedSky is unlikely. This seems to be only the internal coolant distribution efficiency but does not include the mechanical cooling nor the chillers. So far I wasn&#039;t able to find any more detailed information about RedSky and how this PUE was calculated or measured. Considering the climate in Albuquerque, NM and the lack of large bodies of water indicates that pure free-cooling is unlikely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The claimed PUE of 1.035 for RedSky is unlikely. This seems to be only the internal coolant distribution efficiency but does not include the mechanical cooling nor the chillers. So far I wasn&#8217;t able to find any more detailed information about RedSky and how this PUE was calculated or measured. Considering the climate in Albuquerque, NM and the lack of large bodies of water indicates that pure free-cooling is unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data center water cooling and other thoughts. &#171; The Server Room</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/11/17/red-sky-supercomputing-efficiency-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-8168</link>
		<dc:creator>Data center water cooling and other thoughts. &#171; The Server Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=18336#comment-8168</guid>
		<description>[...] first point comes from reading about using Sun rear door cooling and previous articles on IBM rear door water cooling. It might just be me, but it would make a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first point comes from reading about using Sun rear door cooling and previous articles on IBM rear door water cooling. It might just be me, but it would make a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

