<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s Spooktacular Scaling for Halloween</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/30/facebooks-spooktacular-scaling-for-halloween/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/30/facebooks-spooktacular-scaling-for-halloween/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/30/facebooks-spooktacular-scaling-for-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-7783</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=17576#comment-7783</guid>
		<description>For those who are interested, here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/09/25/facebook-google-ready-for-faster-ethernet/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;our coverage &lt;/a&gt;of the Facebook presentation at the Ethernet Alliance event, which includes a link to the video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who are interested, here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/09/25/facebook-google-ready-for-faster-ethernet/" rel="nofollow">our coverage </a>of the Facebook presentation at the Ethernet Alliance event, which includes a link to the video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SectorX4</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/30/facebooks-spooktacular-scaling-for-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-7782</link>
		<dc:creator>SectorX4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=17576#comment-7782</guid>
		<description>I think Ian L made it fairly clear that he was referring to the scale that Facebook runs at and not a smaller operation where it would be seen as a lot larger of an investment.

To understand the kind of traffic and IO that Facebook pushes I&#039;d recommend to check out Facebook&#039;s presentation on 100Gbit Ethernet / Terabit Ethernet. Hopefully this will put 40TB into perspective :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ian L made it fairly clear that he was referring to the scale that Facebook runs at and not a smaller operation where it would be seen as a lot larger of an investment.</p>
<p>To understand the kind of traffic and IO that Facebook pushes I&#8217;d recommend to check out Facebook&#8217;s presentation on 100Gbit Ethernet / Terabit Ethernet. Hopefully this will put 40TB into perspective <img src='http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ker2x</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/30/facebooks-spooktacular-scaling-for-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-7757</link>
		<dc:creator>ker2x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=17576#comment-7757</guid>
		<description>40TB for a single day, That need to be server ASAP.
Not a tons ? Ermmm... dunno where you work, but for the mortal, (even for a (mortal) sysadmin), i think it&#039;s a huge workload. Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40TB for a single day, That need to be server ASAP.<br />
Not a tons ? Ermmm&#8230; dunno where you work, but for the mortal, (even for a (mortal) sysadmin), i think it&#8217;s a huge workload. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian L</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/30/facebooks-spooktacular-scaling-for-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-7744</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=17576#comment-7744</guid>
		<description>In all fairness, 40TB isn&#039;t a ton of storage when push comes to shove. Yes it&#039;s a lot for SSDs or RAM, but it&#039;s only about 150 300GB SAS drives, counting a little bit of RAID overhead. Put those into larger-scale storage servers and you&#039;ve got a dozen servers, maybe two, taking up about a rack of space. Huge for a smaller operation, and that was last year, but a drop in the bucket when you have over 30,000 servers already online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness, 40TB isn&#8217;t a ton of storage when push comes to shove. Yes it&#8217;s a lot for SSDs or RAM, but it&#8217;s only about 150 300GB SAS drives, counting a little bit of RAID overhead. Put those into larger-scale storage servers and you&#8217;ve got a dozen servers, maybe two, taking up about a rack of space. Huge for a smaller operation, and that was last year, but a drop in the bucket when you have over 30,000 servers already online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

