<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Host Hacked Via Virtualization Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Site web piraté pour cause de virtualisation</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-4188</link>
		<dc:creator>Site web piraté pour cause de virtualisation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=11598#comment-4188</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/" rel="nofollow">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B James</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-4176</link>
		<dc:creator>B James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=11598#comment-4176</guid>
		<description>Virtualization and a hack wiping things out is no more or less a security issue then if someone gains access to large central storage systems in use in data centers and the ability to destroy large amounts of data.  There are many &quot;soft&quot; sides to data, and while virtualization is rather new (outside of the mainframe arena) its by far not the weakest link...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtualization and a hack wiping things out is no more or less a security issue then if someone gains access to large central storage systems in use in data centers and the ability to destroy large amounts of data.  There are many &#8220;soft&#8221; sides to data, and while virtualization is rather new (outside of the mainframe arena) its by far not the weakest link&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/09/web-host-hacked-via-virtualization-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-4169</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=11598#comment-4169</guid>
		<description>Well spotted - to clarify the 0-day was in the management layer rather than the hypervisor itself... I was hoping for the latter so as people would start to take the issue seriously.

Anyway the management layer is certainly the soft underbelly of cloud computing... it needs to be well (which is to say, better) protected.

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well spotted &#8211; to clarify the 0-day was in the management layer rather than the hypervisor itself&#8230; I was hoping for the latter so as people would start to take the issue seriously.</p>
<p>Anyway the management layer is certainly the soft underbelly of cloud computing&#8230; it needs to be well (which is to say, better) protected.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

