<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dell Targets TCO with Fortuna Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/22/dell-targets-tco-with-fortuna-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/22/dell-targets-tco-with-fortuna-server/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/22/dell-targets-tco-with-fortuna-server/comment-page-1/#comment-22019</link>
		<dc:creator>David Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10901#comment-22019</guid>
		<description>Karl, the Dell M1000 chassis would be the closest comparison to the HP c7000 chassis.  That chassis has the networking, etc. built in.  This product is geared toward a totally different market.

Faisal, if you will contact me offline ( david_meyer@dell.com) I can chat more with you about this.

Thanks,

DM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl, the Dell M1000 chassis would be the closest comparison to the HP c7000 chassis.  That chassis has the networking, etc. built in.  This product is geared toward a totally different market.</p>
<p>Faisal, if you will contact me offline ( <a href="mailto:david_meyer@dell.com">david_meyer@dell.com</a>) I can chat more with you about this.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>DM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faisal Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/22/dell-targets-tco-with-fortuna-server/comment-page-1/#comment-4049</link>
		<dc:creator>Faisal Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10901#comment-4049</guid>
		<description>The power rating is simply amazing. Any one have any idea on its pricing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The power rating is simply amazing. Any one have any idea on its pricing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/22/dell-targets-tco-with-fortuna-server/comment-page-1/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10901#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>Nice... But no integrated network in the server chassis? Come on...
Make it a 3U and put a Cisco 3750 inside and drop the external NIC ports.
We really don&#039;t need more cables in our data centers. 

The integrated network and san infrastructure that blade system usually come with is an important feature. The HP C7000 chassis is excellent and I&#039;m sure Dell and IBM have equal products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230; But no integrated network in the server chassis? Come on&#8230;<br />
Make it a 3U and put a Cisco 3750 inside and drop the external NIC ports.<br />
We really don&#8217;t need more cables in our data centers. </p>
<p>The integrated network and san infrastructure that blade system usually come with is an important feature. The HP C7000 chassis is excellent and I&#8217;m sure Dell and IBM have equal products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

