<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WolframAlpha Struggles in Traffic Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-struggles-in-traffic-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-struggles-in-traffic-tests/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Estrutura Computacional do Novo Buscador Wolfram &#171; Flaviotechblog</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-struggles-in-traffic-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-4100</link>
		<dc:creator>A Estrutura Computacional do Novo Buscador Wolfram &#171; Flaviotechblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10631#comment-4100</guid>
		<description>[...] por trás do Wolfram informou que o mesmo possui uma superestrutura para lidar com o tráfego, mas parece que nas fases de testes os servidores não aguentaram a carga. Fazer esses tipos de testes é um procedimento raro em algumas empresas (principalmente algumas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] por trás do Wolfram informou que o mesmo possui uma superestrutura para lidar com o tráfego, mas parece que nas fases de testes os servidores não aguentaram a carga. Fazer esses tipos de testes é um procedimento raro em algumas empresas (principalmente algumas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfram</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-struggles-in-traffic-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3903</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10631#comment-3903</guid>
		<description>Wolfram is not a search engine lol. Its a computational Engine and it is quite useful..  maybe its not useful to you but to me, it is extremely useful and has great features which I have been using.  

Steve Wolfram  is my new friend =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfram is not a search engine lol. Its a computational Engine and it is quite useful..  maybe its not useful to you but to me, it is extremely useful and has great features which I have been using.  </p>
<p>Steve Wolfram  is my new friend =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-struggles-in-traffic-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3895</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10631#comment-3895</guid>
		<description>This is *worse* than Cuil.
Cuil is at least slightly useful, this doesn&#039;t return results for 90% of the stuff I type in.

They should change the name to &quot;Worthless&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is *worse* than Cuil.<br />
Cuil is at least slightly useful, this doesn&#8217;t return results for 90% of the stuff I type in.</p>
<p>They should change the name to &#8220;Worthless&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolframAlpha è vivo !</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-struggles-in-traffic-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>WolframAlpha è vivo !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 06:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10631#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>[...] il suo nuovo strumento di ricerca. Le prime impressioni d&#8217;uso di ReadWriteWeb, CNET News, Data Center Knowledge, Lifehacker, Gizmodo , TechCrunch , L.A. Times Tech Blog, Mashable , Search Engine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] il suo nuovo strumento di ricerca. Le prime impressioni d&#8217;uso di ReadWriteWeb, CNET News, Data Center Knowledge, Lifehacker, Gizmodo , TechCrunch , L.A. Times Tech Blog, Mashable , Search Engine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-struggles-in-traffic-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3870</link>
		<dc:creator>Son Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=10631#comment-3870</guid>
		<description>Infrastructure is definitely a disadvantage of search startups when comparing to Google, Microsoft or Yahoo. Nothing beat real life stress test and they&#039;re doing it a bit too late. I guess this is just another Cuil. The real competitors of Google are Yahoo and Microsoft. I&#039;m using Yahoo as the default search engine and have been able to find everything. I did not miss Google one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infrastructure is definitely a disadvantage of search startups when comparing to Google, Microsoft or Yahoo. Nothing beat real life stress test and they&#8217;re doing it a bit too late. I guess this is just another Cuil. The real competitors of Google are Yahoo and Microsoft. I&#8217;m using Yahoo as the default search engine and have been able to find everything. I did not miss Google one bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
