<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McKinsey: Data Centers Cheaper Than Cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/mckinsey-data-centers-cheaper-than-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/mckinsey-data-centers-cheaper-than-cloud/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OPM</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/mckinsey-data-centers-cheaper-than-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-3550</link>
		<dc:creator>OPM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9375#comment-3550</guid>
		<description>These guys have clearly never built a datacenter, the initial capital investment is not for everybody, it is massive, the data center or a virtual data center both have their applications, would Google, MS, or amazon run on the cloud, they might, BECAUSE FREE CASH matters.....but, Data Centers are cheaper than cloud...so cloud, as applied to MS and Google, must exceed 600M of investment....in my books, that&#039;s a lot of compute cycles and lowly utilized assets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys have clearly never built a datacenter, the initial capital investment is not for everybody, it is massive, the data center or a virtual data center both have their applications, would Google, MS, or amazon run on the cloud, they might, BECAUSE FREE CASH matters&#8230;..but, Data Centers are cheaper than cloud&#8230;so cloud, as applied to MS and Google, must exceed 600M of investment&#8230;.in my books, that&#8217;s a lot of compute cycles and lowly utilized assets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix figuereo</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/mckinsey-data-centers-cheaper-than-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>felix figuereo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9375#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>As a small business owner, I must say, cloud has been a life saver. As our needs grow I am sure our options will too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a small business owner, I must say, cloud has been a life saver. As our needs grow I am sure our options will too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catalina588</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/mckinsey-data-centers-cheaper-than-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-3471</link>
		<dc:creator>Catalina588</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9375#comment-3471</guid>
		<description>Wish I had seen the presentation live.  Recommend readers download it and review because it is spot on.

The article above missed the key takeaway: enterprise datacenters need to rearchitect infrastructure with virtualization to drive much higher average utilization rates (10% today used by McKinsey, for example). Above a &quot;magic&quot;, to-be-determined, enterprise-independent, cost-effective utilization rate of 60% (hypothetically), throw the excess workloads on the clouds and pay as variable operating expenses.

Think of all the peak hour-capacity, monthly- and annual- job capacity that sits idle most of the time and could be moved, as needed, into the cloud -- reducing the daily operating loads and needed capacity substantially (i.e., materially).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I had seen the presentation live.  Recommend readers download it and review because it is spot on.</p>
<p>The article above missed the key takeaway: enterprise datacenters need to rearchitect infrastructure with virtualization to drive much higher average utilization rates (10% today used by McKinsey, for example). Above a &#8220;magic&#8221;, to-be-determined, enterprise-independent, cost-effective utilization rate of 60% (hypothetically), throw the excess workloads on the clouds and pay as variable operating expenses.</p>
<p>Think of all the peak hour-capacity, monthly- and annual- job capacity that sits idle most of the time and could be moved, as needed, into the cloud &#8212; reducing the daily operating loads and needed capacity substantially (i.e., materially).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ky</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/mckinsey-data-centers-cheaper-than-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-3461</link>
		<dc:creator>Ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9375#comment-3461</guid>
		<description>The summary here is very simple...the cloud model is not for everybody.  However, the headline is misleading and inappropriate (&quot;Data Centers Cheaper Than Cloud&quot;), which is not always true.
--ky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The summary here is very simple&#8230;the cloud model is not for everybody.  However, the headline is misleading and inappropriate (&#8220;Data Centers Cheaper Than Cloud&#8221;), which is not always true.<br />
&#8211;ky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Goolsbee</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/mckinsey-data-centers-cheaper-than-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Goolsbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9375#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>These guys get it. Both their analysis and definition are spot-on. 

If I were a startup with limited resources?  Or if I&#039;m focussing on building a business in &quot;useless chatter&quot; (ie a twitter-like, myspace-like model, where data is in constantly churning and changing and stuff from the day-before-yesterday is irrelevant) then I&#039;d be all over the outsourced cloud for my needs. It scales and shrinks. I get that.

But if I am a CIO in corporate America? No way. My data is critical. My data history is critical. My data integrity and audit ability is even more critical. I&#039;d be building, or leasing my own datacenter, or if not large enough, I&#039;d be buying colocation.

--chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys get it. Both their analysis and definition are spot-on. </p>
<p>If I were a startup with limited resources?  Or if I&#8217;m focussing on building a business in &#8220;useless chatter&#8221; (ie a twitter-like, myspace-like model, where data is in constantly churning and changing and stuff from the day-before-yesterday is irrelevant) then I&#8217;d be all over the outsourced cloud for my needs. It scales and shrinks. I get that.</p>
<p>But if I am a CIO in corporate America? No way. My data is critical. My data history is critical. My data integrity and audit ability is even more critical. I&#8217;d be building, or leasing my own datacenter, or if not large enough, I&#8217;d be buying colocation.</p>
<p>&#8211;chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
