<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Customer Always Right? Not at Internap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/is-the-customer-always-right-not-at-internap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/is-the-customer-always-right-not-at-internap/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/is-the-customer-always-right-not-at-internap/comment-page-1/#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9354#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>@nottlv

I suppose if you throw in the names of some big brands it serves to make internap look stupid and I dare say a good proportion of the people reading the blog don&#039;t have a clue about the technicalities but it might be enough to dissuade them from buying services from internap, thus damaging their brand and wringing out some compensation in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nottlv</p>
<p>I suppose if you throw in the names of some big brands it serves to make internap look stupid and I dare say a good proportion of the people reading the blog don&#8217;t have a clue about the technicalities but it might be enough to dissuade them from buying services from internap, thus damaging their brand and wringing out some compensation in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nottlv</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/15/is-the-customer-always-right-not-at-internap/comment-page-1/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>nottlv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9354#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>To my knowledge companies like Google, Yahoo &amp; Verizon don&#039;t purchase transit from Internap (and a looking glass and AS route search shows that), so how could they also be affected by an Internap network issue?  Maybe those companies have a presence in that same Equinix facility (looks like Equinix Sunnyvale), but it doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re customers of Internap.   And why is the CMO talking about this while sunning himself in Mexico and not the CTO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my knowledge companies like Google, Yahoo &amp; Verizon don&#8217;t purchase transit from Internap (and a looking glass and AS route search shows that), so how could they also be affected by an Internap network issue?  Maybe those companies have a presence in that same Equinix facility (looks like Equinix Sunnyvale), but it doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re customers of Internap.   And why is the CMO talking about this while sunning himself in Mexico and not the CTO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

