<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DDoS Attacks on Web Hosts Continue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Prevost</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-5210</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Prevost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-5210</guid>
		<description>Security is not something that is 100% guaranteed ever.  I imagine low cost providers have some degree of protection that their budget can afford, however I recall an ad in a futureshop flyer for a sonicwall hardware-style firewall.  Their claim was &quot;100% unhackable&quot; and the folks from Dept of Nat&#039;l Defence here in Canada in the college program I was in just laughed at it.  So the moral of this story... no one person/company/hosting site is 100% immune to attacks.  I mean how can you deal with sheer volume of requests? Quite simply, you can&#039;t - so you crash and burn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security is not something that is 100% guaranteed ever.  I imagine low cost providers have some degree of protection that their budget can afford, however I recall an ad in a futureshop flyer for a sonicwall hardware-style firewall.  Their claim was &#8220;100% unhackable&#8221; and the folks from Dept of Nat&#8217;l Defence here in Canada in the college program I was in just laughed at it.  So the moral of this story&#8230; no one person/company/hosting site is 100% immune to attacks.  I mean how can you deal with sheer volume of requests? Quite simply, you can&#8217;t &#8211; so you crash and burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abel Braaksma</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-5011</link>
		<dc:creator>Abel Braaksma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-5011</guid>
		<description>Seems that another one can be added to your list. Yesterday, the larger part of the DNS servers of www.register.com and their own website has been down. So far, I haven&#039;t find any news items about it (my site was not found for a short while, register.com was down for 6 hours or more, others have had larger interruptions), but here&#039;s a few twitters that reported it: http://search.twitter.com/search?max_id=2788621361&amp;q=register.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that another one can be added to your list. Yesterday, the larger part of the DNS servers of <a href="http://www.register.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.register.com</a> and their own website has been down. So far, I haven&#8217;t find any news items about it (my site was not found for a short while, register.com was down for 6 hours or more, others have had larger interruptions), but here&#8217;s a few twitters that reported it: <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?max_id=2788621361&#038;q=register.com" rel="nofollow">http://search.twitter.com/search?max_id=2788621361&#038;q=register.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Attacks On the Rise &#124; FireBlog &#124; FireHost</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-4184</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Attacks On the Rise &#124; FireBlog &#124; FireHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-4184</guid>
		<description>[...] crash or restart resulting in one to hundreds of websites going down. Most recently, there were 4 major attacks against web hosts. This strategy affected thousands of web hosting companies&#8217; clients, taking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crash or restart resulting in one to hundreds of websites going down. Most recently, there were 4 major attacks against web hosts. This strategy affected thousands of web hosting companies&#8217; clients, taking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Extends Windows XP Availability But Ends XP Support and Generates Botnets &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Extends Windows XP Availability But Ends XP Support and Generates Botnets &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>[...] Jokes aside, there is a great deal of turbulence on the Internet based on what we are told and there is evidence too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jokes aside, there is a great deal of turbulence on the Internet based on what we are told and there is evidence too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDoS Angriffe auf mehrere Webhoster &#124; Netzhappen</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>DDoS Angriffe auf mehrere Webhoster &#124; Netzhappen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>[...] In der letzten Woche gab es eine Reihe von Distributed Denial of Servive (DDoS) Attacken auf große Internet Webhoster und Domain Name Provider. Aufgrund dieser Angriffe waren zehntausende von Webseiten betroffen und ihre Dienste gestört. Hier eine Zeitlinie der Ereignisse vergangener Woche zusammengestellt von datacenterknowledge: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In der letzten Woche gab es eine Reihe von Distributed Denial of Servive (DDoS) Attacken auf große Internet Webhoster und Domain Name Provider. Aufgrund dieser Angriffe waren zehntausende von Webseiten betroffen und ihre Dienste gestört. Hier eine Zeitlinie der Ereignisse vergangener Woche zusammengestellt von datacenterknowledge: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: April 7th, 2009 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: April 7th, 2009 &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/&#038;#8230" rel="nofollow">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/&#038;#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faisal Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>Faisal Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t think its fair to say what you have just cited. ThePlanet and others - have a lot of excellent security gear (CiscoGuard, Arbor, etc.), but when you&#039;re faced with a massive DDoS (sizes are typically above 5-10Gbps easily, it is not as simple as &#039;null-routing&#039; an IP address. FireHost.com - I have no idea about their capacity, but large levels DDoS even bring Tier 1 carrier to their knees. So one can quite confidently argue, that no one provider can stop it all. It take lots of 10G circuits, lot of very expensive DPI devices and mitigation devices to thwart and filter DDoS attacks.

When you&#039;re renting out a camp site on the beach, nothing much you can do when a tsunami hits........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t think its fair to say what you have just cited. ThePlanet and others &#8211; have a lot of excellent security gear (CiscoGuard, Arbor, etc.), but when you&#8217;re faced with a massive DDoS (sizes are typically above 5-10Gbps easily, it is not as simple as &#8216;null-routing&#8217; an IP address. FireHost.com &#8211; I have no idea about their capacity, but large levels DDoS even bring Tier 1 carrier to their knees. So one can quite confidently argue, that no one provider can stop it all. It take lots of 10G circuits, lot of very expensive DPI devices and mitigation devices to thwart and filter DDoS attacks.</p>
<p>When you&#8217;re renting out a camp site on the beach, nothing much you can do when a tsunami hits&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott S.</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/07/ddos-attacks-on-web-hosts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=9082#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>I think it is very sad when hosting company&#039;s tout their low-cost hosting and never tell their clients of the security risks. Worse, is when they do nothing to prevent these attacks. FireHost.com filters traffic at the HTTP and network level... that&#039;s just the beginning of their very real, very effective security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is very sad when hosting company&#8217;s tout their low-cost hosting and never tell their clients of the security risks. Worse, is when they do nothing to prevent these attacks. FireHost.com filters traffic at the HTTP and network level&#8230; that&#8217;s just the beginning of their very real, very effective security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

