<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon: $86 Million in Servers in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dissecting the New SGI&#8217;s Plan for Profitability: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-45776</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissecting the New SGI&#8217;s Plan for Profitability: Cloud Computing News &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=8549#comment-45776</guid>
		<description>[...] The new SGI isn&#8217;t wholly dependent on selling huge shared-memory systems to national labs, though. According to Barrenechea, the company doesn&#8217;t break down revenue by divisions, but it expects only about one-third of annual revenue to come from the traditional SGI products, with the remaining two-thirds split equally between services and the Rackable business line, which focuses on dense, energy-efficient servers for webscale data centers. The company has never really moved the needle in terms of overall server sales, but it does have some high-profile customers &#8212; including eBay, Carbonite, Microsoft, BT and Amazon &#8212; that contribute enough to the bottom line as they fill their data centers with Rackable gear. During a data-center build-out in 2008, Amazon bought $86 million worth of Rackable servers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new SGI isn&#8217;t wholly dependent on selling huge shared-memory systems to national labs, though. According to Barrenechea, the company doesn&#8217;t break down revenue by divisions, but it expects only about one-third of annual revenue to come from the traditional SGI products, with the remaining two-thirds split equally between services and the Rackable business line, which focuses on dense, energy-efficient servers for webscale data centers. The company has never really moved the needle in terms of overall server sales, but it does have some high-profile customers &#8212; including eBay, Carbonite, Microsoft, BT and Amazon &#8212; that contribute enough to the bottom line as they fill their data centers with Rackable gear. During a data-center build-out in 2008, Amazon bought $86 million worth of Rackable servers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data: Information VS Insights // thestorry.com &#124;&#124; Grant Storry</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-17668</link>
		<dc:creator>Data: Information VS Insights // thestorry.com &#124;&#124; Grant Storry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=8549#comment-17668</guid>
		<description>[...] Amazon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amazon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 6</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=8549#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>[...] How much does a cloud cost, part 2  Amazon spent $56 million on servers with Rackable in 2007, but boosted that to $86 million last year&#8230;. Microsoft (MSFT) bought about $126 million in Rackable equipment in 2007, but just $35 million in 2008, according to data from Rackable’s latest 10-K filing with the SEC. Yahoo (YHOO), which accounted for a quarter of Rackable’s revenue in 2007, no longer makes the list of the company’s largest customers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How much does a cloud cost, part 2  Amazon spent $56 million on servers with Rackable in 2007, but boosted that to $86 million last year&#8230;. Microsoft (MSFT) bought about $126 million in Rackable equipment in 2007, but just $35 million in 2008, according to data from Rackable’s latest 10-K filing with the SEC. Yahoo (YHOO), which accounted for a quarter of Rackable’s revenue in 2007, no longer makes the list of the company’s largest customers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-03-26 &#171; Brent Sordyl&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-03-26 &#171; Brent Sordyl&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=8549#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>[...] Amazon: $86 Million in Servers in 2008 « Data Center Knowledge Amazon bought more than $86 million in servers from Rackable Systems in 2008, surpassing Microsoft as the server maker’s largest customer. The investment in data center hardware is likely tied to the growth of Amazon Web Services, the retailer’s fast-growing cloud computing operation. Amazon (AMZN) doesn’t break out any revenue data for its AWS operation, but recently noted that its S3 storage service now stores 40 billion objects, an increase of 11 billion from October and three times the volume from a year ago. (tags: aws) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amazon: $86 Million in Servers in 2008 « Data Center Knowledge Amazon bought more than $86 million in servers from Rackable Systems in 2008, surpassing Microsoft as the server maker’s largest customer. The investment in data center hardware is likely tied to the growth of Amazon Web Services, the retailer’s fast-growing cloud computing operation. Amazon (AMZN) doesn’t break out any revenue data for its AWS operation, but recently noted that its S3 storage service now stores 40 billion objects, an increase of 11 billion from October and three times the volume from a year ago. (tags: aws) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BotchagalupeMarks for March 23rd - 09:14 &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>BotchagalupeMarks for March 23rd - 09:14 &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=8549#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>[...] Amazon: $86 Million in Servers in 2008 &#171; Data Center Knowledge - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amazon: $86 Million in Servers in 2008 &laquo; Data Center Knowledge &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Girish</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/03/20/amazon-86-million-in-servers-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>Girish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=8549#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>At 5K/server it is more than 17,000 servers...cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 5K/server it is more than 17,000 servers&#8230;cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

