Google Sees Malware Everywhere

Last year Google began warning users when a search result included a site known to infect users with viruses, worms or trojans. Early this morning something went badly wrong with that function, and Google began flagging every site in its results with the warning “This site may harm your computer.” 

The problem lasted about 40 minutes, and was caused by human error, as Google’s Marissa Mayer explained on the Google blog:

We maintain a list of such sites through both manual and automated methods. We work with a non-profit called to come up with criteria for maintaining this list, and to provide simple processes for webmasters to remove their site from the list. We periodically update that list and released one such update to the site this morning. Unfortunately (and here’s the human error), the URL of ‘/’ was mistakenly checked in as a value to the file and ‘/’ expands to all URLs.

Oops. This triggered another huge problem: the Google warnings on every result clicked through to additional information on the StopBadware site. “This led to a denial of service of our website, as millions of Google users attempted to visit our site for more information,” explained Maxim Weinstein at StopBadware. Some early media reports apparently falsely blamed the problems on StopBadware.

Get Daily Email News from DCK!
Subscribe now and get our special report, "The World's Most Unique Data Centers."

Enter your email to receive messages about offerings by Penton, its brands, affiliates and/or third-party partners, consistent with Penton's Privacy Policy.

About the Author

Rich Miller is the founder and editor at large of Data Center Knowledge, and has been reporting on the data center sector since 2000. He has tracked the growing impact of high-density computing on the power and cooling of data centers, and the resulting push for improved energy efficiency in these facilities.

Add Your Comments

  • (will not be published)

One Comment

  1. Prasanna Prabhu

    I'm surprised that when that FLAG was checked there was no 2nd person (second pair of eyes) watching that. I think production changes / release should always have atleast 2 gate-keepers who watch each others back My 2 cents... BTW, did I mention, there needs to be a AUTOMATED CHECK-LIST on "What NOT TO DO" :)