<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ma.gnolia Crashes, Recovery Uncertain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/30/magnolia-crashes-cloud-reliability-debated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/30/magnolia-crashes-cloud-reliability-debated/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Data replication hardware that&#8217;s Fire, Bomb, Blast, Water Proof&#8230; &#171; Silverback Migration Solutions Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/30/magnolia-crashes-cloud-reliability-debated/comment-page-1/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>Data replication hardware that&#8217;s Fire, Bomb, Blast, Water Proof&#8230; &#171; Silverback Migration Solutions Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6871#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>[...] loss is a real problem. Look at Ma.gnolia, they had significant data loss problems, and their facility wasn&#8217;t even on fire or under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] loss is a real problem. Look at Ma.gnolia, they had significant data loss problems, and their facility wasn&#8217;t even on fire or under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIP Ma.gnolia - Back to Delicious &#124; Open Parenthesis</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/30/magnolia-crashes-cloud-reliability-debated/comment-page-1/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>RIP Ma.gnolia - Back to Delicious &#124; Open Parenthesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6871#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>[...] those of you who&#8217;ve been blissfully unaware, the social bookmarking service ma.gnolia imploded late last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those of you who&#8217;ve been blissfully unaware, the social bookmarking service ma.gnolia imploded late last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/30/magnolia-crashes-cloud-reliability-debated/comment-page-1/#comment-2740</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6871#comment-2740</guid>
		<description>Hi John. 

That&#039;s a fair point. I&#039;ve adjusted the headline to reflect that.

However, bear in mind that the discussions springing up around this event *are* mentioning cloud reliability. The challenge is that the &quot;cloud everything&quot; environment is blurring these distinctions for casual observers and more than a few potential users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a fair point. I&#8217;ve adjusted the headline to reflect that.</p>
<p>However, bear in mind that the discussions springing up around this event *are* mentioning cloud reliability. The challenge is that the &#8220;cloud everything&#8221; environment is blurring these distinctions for casual observers and more than a few potential users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/30/magnolia-crashes-cloud-reliability-debated/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6871#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>Ma.gnolia is not cloud computing! My bet is they&#039;ve got 4 web servers and a single mySQL database server. Hardly cloud computing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ma.gnolia is not cloud computing! My bet is they&#8217;ve got 4 web servers and a single mySQL database server. Hardly cloud computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
