<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Private Clouds an Oxymoron?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/19/are-private-clouds-an-oxymoron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/19/are-private-clouds-an-oxymoron/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inside Network Redux &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links for 1.19.09</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/19/are-private-clouds-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside Network Redux &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links for 1.19.09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6442#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Private Clouds an Oxymoron? « Data Center Knowledge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Private Clouds an Oxymoron? « Data Center Knowledge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/19/are-private-clouds-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6442#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>I think the problem is the lack of a clear definition for the word &quot;Cloud&quot;. What I understand the use of the word &quot;Cloud&quot; is as a method of organizing IT infrastructure such that the underlying hardware is abstracted for the purpose of removing complexity for the end-user and eliminating the need to purchase infrastructure to meet each end-user&#039;s maximum compute needs. 

So, from that perspective, any system which layers on some sort of Grid Computing system is a cloud -- that covers Google/Amazon&#039;s offerings down to a &quot;private cloud&quot; system.

However, if one takes the term as how Conray-Murry uses it (an external provider of utility compute services, most likely backed by the abstraction I described two paragraphs above), then, no, there is no possible way for a &quot;private cloud&quot; to exist.

I don&#039;t think Conray-Murry&#039;s understanding is meaningful, however, as the distinction between Google/Amazon and a &quot;private cloud&quot; is one solely of ownership. The underlying software/hardware techniques are comparable, the end-user&#039;s experience is similar, and, with the exception of the utility compute service contract, the services that can be bundled or that can leverage the &quot;cloud&quot; are nearly identical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem is the lack of a clear definition for the word &#8220;Cloud&#8221;. What I understand the use of the word &#8220;Cloud&#8221; is as a method of organizing IT infrastructure such that the underlying hardware is abstracted for the purpose of removing complexity for the end-user and eliminating the need to purchase infrastructure to meet each end-user&#8217;s maximum compute needs. </p>
<p>So, from that perspective, any system which layers on some sort of Grid Computing system is a cloud &#8212; that covers Google/Amazon&#8217;s offerings down to a &#8220;private cloud&#8221; system.</p>
<p>However, if one takes the term as how Conray-Murry uses it (an external provider of utility compute services, most likely backed by the abstraction I described two paragraphs above), then, no, there is no possible way for a &#8220;private cloud&#8221; to exist.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Conray-Murry&#8217;s understanding is meaningful, however, as the distinction between Google/Amazon and a &#8220;private cloud&#8221; is one solely of ownership. The underlying software/hardware techniques are comparable, the end-user&#8217;s experience is similar, and, with the exception of the utility compute service contract, the services that can be bundled or that can leverage the &#8220;cloud&#8221; are nearly identical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hollis</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/19/are-private-clouds-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-2621</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6442#comment-2621</guid>
		<description>Timely post

I (and others) would argue that &quot;private&quot; has to do with notions of control, and less physical locations.

A rather lengthy post here:
http://chucksblog.emc.com/chucks_blog/2009/01/the-emergence-of-private-clouds.html

-- Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timely post</p>
<p>I (and others) would argue that &#8220;private&#8221; has to do with notions of control, and less physical locations.</p>
<p>A rather lengthy post here:<br />
<a href="http://chucksblog.emc.com/chucks_blog/2009/01/the-emergence-of-private-clouds.html" rel="nofollow">http://chucksblog.emc.com/chucks_blog/2009/01/the-emergence-of-private-clouds.html</a></p>
<p>&#8211; Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/01/19/are-private-clouds-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=6442#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think this will involve any paradigm ahift, I think this is what we have to work with every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think this will involve any paradigm ahift, I think this is what we have to work with every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
