<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Closer Look At Rackable&#8217;s CloudRack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/31/a-closer-look-at-rackables-cloudrack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/31/a-closer-look-at-rackables-cloudrack/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/31/a-closer-look-at-rackables-cloudrack/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=4422#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>@Chris Sears

It&#039;s definitely a lot more storage than most would think they&#039;d need in a single chassis, but it does has a number of good applications:

-Large scale hadoop clusters
-map reduce clusters
-web host farms
-distributed file or iscsi architectures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Sears</p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely a lot more storage than most would think they&#8217;d need in a single chassis, but it does has a number of good applications:</p>
<p>-Large scale hadoop clusters<br />
-map reduce clusters<br />
-web host farms<br />
-distributed file or iscsi architectures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sears</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/31/a-closer-look-at-rackables-cloudrack/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=4422#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>That seems like way more local storage than is really needed for most cloud computing nodes.

It looks like you could take out 4 drives and fit a whole second motherboard in there for 2 servers in one box sharing a power supply like the Supermicro Twin. Seems like there would be more demand for something like that in this sort of naked server / Google-style rack form factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems like way more local storage than is really needed for most cloud computing nodes.</p>
<p>It looks like you could take out 4 drives and fit a whole second motherboard in there for 2 servers in one box sharing a power supply like the Supermicro Twin. Seems like there would be more demand for something like that in this sort of naked server / Google-style rack form factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

