<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Hosts 10 Billion Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corrigon: Fast, Reliable Image Matching &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-5306</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrigon: Fast, Reliable Image Matching &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-5306</guid>
		<description>[...] Some time ago I predicted that image matching technology would become both cheaper and more effective, making it possible to search for duplicate or near-duplicate images the same way that writers do with text while keeping the price affordable. Tineye was, and remains, a major step in the right direction on that front but its limited database, about 1.2 billion has hindered its ability to be comprehensive (Facebook, Photobucket and Flickr alone combine for over 18 billion images). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some time ago I predicted that image matching technology would become both cheaper and more effective, making it possible to search for duplicate or near-duplicate images the same way that writers do with text while keeping the price affordable. Tineye was, and remains, a major step in the right direction on that front but its limited database, about 1.2 billion has hindered its ability to be comprehensive (Facebook, Photobucket and Flickr alone combine for over 18 billion images). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searching for Your Photos with Tineye</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Searching for Your Photos with Tineye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>[...] The biggest problem Tineye has at this moment is the size of its database. According to a recent update, they estimated the size at over 1 billion images. Though that seems like a very large volume of images, Photobucket alone has well over 5 billion images and Facebook has an estimated 10 billion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The biggest problem Tineye has at this moment is the size of its database. According to a recent update, they estimated the size at over 1 billion images. Though that seems like a very large volume of images, Photobucket alone has well over 5 billion images and Facebook has an estimated 10 billion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Area123&#187;Archivo del blog &#187; 140 millones de usuarios en Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator>Area123&#187;Archivo del blog &#187; 140 millones de usuarios en Facebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-2343</guid>
		<description>[...] usuario tiene 100 amigos. Además Facebook hospeda más de mil millones de fotografías  y más de 700 millones de fotografías son subidas cada [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] usuario tiene 100 amigos. Además Facebook hospeda más de mil millones de fotografías  y más de 700 millones de fotografías son subidas cada [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook, Flickr Strip Copyright Data from Images - PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook, Flickr Strip Copyright Data from Images - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>[...] that, I decided to try Facebook. With over 10 billion photos hosted, Facebook is the largest image host in the world currently. I did the same process with Facebook [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that, I decided to try Facebook. With over 10 billion photos hosted, Facebook is the largest image host in the world currently. I did the same process with Facebook [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Henshaw&#8217;s Hog Blog &#187; Facebook tearing up my desktop</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Henshaw&#8217;s Hog Blog &#187; Facebook tearing up my desktop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-1321</guid>
		<description>[...] times they serve up over 300,000 photos per second. Think about those numbers for just a moment. Data Center Knowledge picked up on the story, and included interesting numbers around the storage involved for this data, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] times they serve up over 300,000 photos per second. Think about those numbers for just a moment. Data Center Knowledge picked up on the story, and included interesting numbers around the storage involved for this data, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Dueck</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Dueck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>True, but he also says that the largest one of those sizes is the ~40kb version shown on photo.php. Even doubling the total data per photo to 80kb doesn&#039;t quite get you to one PB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but he also says that the largest one of those sizes is the ~40kb version shown on photo.php. Even doubling the total data per photo to 80kb doesn&#8217;t quite get you to one PB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Facebook&#039;s Doug Beaver writes that &quot;we actually store four image sizes for each uploaded photo, so that’s over 40 billion files.&quot; That&#039;s still shy of the six versions at Flickr, but might affect the calculations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook&#8217;s Doug Beaver writes that &#8220;we actually store four image sizes for each uploaded photo, so that’s over 40 billion files.&#8221; That&#8217;s still shy of the six versions at Flickr, but might affect the calculations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Dueck</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/facebook-hosts-10-billion-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Dueck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3889#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>Of course, Facebook reduces all photos they upload down to 600x450px, roughly 40k each - while Flickr (for example) stores up to six sizes of each photo including the full original, which could easily total 4MB of data for every photo uploaded from a 5MP camera. 

Taking these as averages, that would put Flickr at 7.5 petabytes to less then half of 1 petabyte for Facebook (of actual photo data).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Facebook reduces all photos they upload down to 600&#215;450px, roughly 40k each &#8211; while Flickr (for example) stores up to six sizes of each photo including the full original, which could easily total 4MB of data for every photo uploaded from a 5MP camera. </p>
<p>Taking these as averages, that would put Flickr at 7.5 petabytes to less then half of 1 petabyte for Facebook (of actual photo data).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
