<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Akamai, Limelight Both Object to CDN Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/akamai-limelight-both-object-to-cdn-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/akamai-limelight-both-object-to-cdn-study/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft and NYU put cat amongst CDN Pigeons &#124; Network Industry Review</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/akamai-limelight-both-object-to-cdn-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft and NYU put cat amongst CDN Pigeons &#124; Network Industry Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3884#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>[...] up via Data Centre Knowledge: &#8220;Akamai, Limelight Both Object to CDN Study&#8221; it looks like some NYU / Microsoft researchers have put the winds up Akamai and Limelight. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up via Data Centre Knowledge: &#8220;Akamai, Limelight Both Object to CDN Study&#8221; it looks like some NYU / Microsoft researchers have put the winds up Akamai and Limelight. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/akamai-limelight-both-object-to-cdn-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3884#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>The Microsoft paper seems to be missing in action now! (check the original link).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Microsoft paper seems to be missing in action now! (check the original link).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie White</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/15/akamai-limelight-both-object-to-cdn-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/?p=3884#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>I would still like to see a more comprehensive comparison of CDN&#039;s out ther. Akamai and Limelight have their points on the analysis, but include Edgecast, BitGravity, CDNetworks (unless they use Akamai or Limelight), for performance, support and cost. All three factors are important to a successful solution....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would still like to see a more comprehensive comparison of CDN&#8217;s out ther. Akamai and Limelight have their points on the analysis, but include Edgecast, BitGravity, CDNetworks (unless they use Akamai or Limelight), for performance, support and cost. All three factors are important to a successful solution&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

