<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hasty Divorce for Twitter, Joyent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/31/hasty-divorce-for-twitter-joyent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/31/hasty-divorce-for-twitter-joyent/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel D</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/31/hasty-divorce-for-twitter-joyent/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/31/hasty-divorce-for-twitter-joyent/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Have to call you out on this. Joyent and twitter did not have a &quot;hasty divorce;&quot; It was known back in mid-December that Twitter was moving away from Joyent and it was not the result of any bad blood between the two companies. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://discuss.joyent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=157592)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://discuss.joyent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=157592)&lt;/a&gt; The news to us Joyent customers was that Twitter and Joyent still HAD a relationship, as we thought they had been gone for at least a month.

Yes, the recent PR two-step between Joyent and twitter is bizarre, but in the light of the history of the situation it&#039;s kind of silly to call this a &quot;hasty divorce.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to call you out on this. Joyent and twitter did not have a &#8220;hasty divorce;&#8221; It was known back in mid-December that Twitter was moving away from Joyent and it was not the result of any bad blood between the two companies. (See <a href="http://discuss.joyent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=157592)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://discuss.joyent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=157592" rel="nofollow">http://discuss.joyent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=157592</a>) The news to us Joyent customers was that Twitter and Joyent still HAD a relationship, as we thought they had been gone for at least a month.</p>
<p>Yes, the recent PR two-step between Joyent and twitter is bizarre, but in the light of the history of the situation it&#8217;s kind of silly to call this a &#8220;hasty divorce.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

