<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surpass Weighs Solar for New Data Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/16/surpass-weighs-solar-for-new-data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/16/surpass-weighs-solar-for-new-data-center/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/16/surpass-weighs-solar-for-new-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/16/surpass-weighs-solar-for-new-data-center/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Looks good Rich, it will be interesting to see if larger companies with larger data centers will be able to get solar energy to handle their power needs. Obviously Google is going for it. Even if they could use solar for part of their data center and then use the traditional utility as backup, they could save in costs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good Rich, it will be interesting to see if larger companies with larger data centers will be able to get solar energy to handle their power needs. Obviously Google is going for it. Even if they could use solar for part of their data center and then use the traditional utility as backup, they could save in costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kayla</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/16/surpass-weighs-solar-for-new-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Kayla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/01/16/surpass-weighs-solar-for-new-data-center/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>What a surprise to see this article. Thank you! I&#039;ll be sure to post our progress as research goes on.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a surprise to see this article. Thank you! I&#8217;ll be sure to post our progress as research goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

