<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Google Eyes Kansas for Data Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/12/28/report-google-eyes-kansas-for-data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/12/28/report-google-eyes-kansas-for-data-center/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about data centers, cloud computing, managed hosting and disaster recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/12/28/report-google-eyes-kansas-for-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/12/28/report-google-eyes-kansas-for-data-center/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Frank,

We&#039;ve actually written quite a bit about underground data centers this year, as this has been a growing trend within the industry. Check out this post for a list of eight or nine providers targeting this niche:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/Dec/11/ozark_mountain_data_bunker_gets_tenant.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/Dec/11/ozark_mountain_data_bunker_gets_tenant.html&lt;/a&gt;

or

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2zsjbf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2zsjbf&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve actually written quite a bit about underground data centers this year, as this has been a growing trend within the industry. Check out this post for a list of eight or nine providers targeting this niche:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/Dec/11/ozark_mountain_data_bunker_gets_tenant.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/Dec/11/ozark_mountain_data_bunker_gets_tenant.html</a></p>
<p>or</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/2zsjbf" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2zsjbf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank A. Coluccio</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/12/28/report-google-eyes-kansas-for-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank A. Coluccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/12/28/report-google-eyes-kansas-for-data-center/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Rich, thanks for exposing this story concerning Google&#039;s purported intentions in Kansas, and more importantly, thanks for all of the excellent reporting you&#039;ve been doing on data centers, in general. I reposted your account of this story to my forum on Silicon Investor and added an exordium in brackets [FAC .. ] in which I briefly discussed underground (and hardened) telco central offices of yore, which you and others here might find interesting: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/39w5qz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/39w5qz&lt;/a&gt;

To the point of hardened underground data centers, however, I&#039;ve not seen much, if any, verbiage on the topic either here or in other trade press, although I did take special note of your story of yesterday concerning a rooftop implementation, which I thought was rather intriguing and a possible fit for localities that are relatively free of the problems cited in the Greensburg story and could also, possibly, lead to other innovative possibilities, as well.

But what about underground data centers? Do you or any of your readers have any thoughts on the subject?

Cheers!



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, thanks for exposing this story concerning Google&#8217;s purported intentions in Kansas, and more importantly, thanks for all of the excellent reporting you&#8217;ve been doing on data centers, in general. I reposted your account of this story to my forum on Silicon Investor and added an exordium in brackets [FAC .. ] in which I briefly discussed underground (and hardened) telco central offices of yore, which you and others here might find interesting: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/39w5qz" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/39w5qz</a></p>
<p>To the point of hardened underground data centers, however, I&#8217;ve not seen much, if any, verbiage on the topic either here or in other trade press, although I did take special note of your story of yesterday concerning a rooftop implementation, which I thought was rather intriguing and a possible fit for localities that are relatively free of the problems cited in the Greensburg story and could also, possibly, lead to other innovative possibilities, as well.</p>
<p>But what about underground data centers? Do you or any of your readers have any thoughts on the subject?</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

